When you pay commissions matters almost as much as how much you pay. Payout timing shapes how reps plan their personal finances, how they pace their deal closures, and how your finance team manages cash flow. Choosing the wrong cadence can create sandbagging, cash crunches, or unnecessary attrition. Here is how to pick the right approach for your sales organization.

Monthly Payouts

Monthly commissions are paid on the payroll cycle following the month a deal is booked or invoiced. A deal closed on March 12 would appear on the April paycheck.

Advantages: - Strongest behavioral link between closing a deal and getting paid - Reps can track earnings in near-real-time, reducing disputes - Smaller, predictable cash outflows for finance - Lower administrative burden for calculating cumulative attainment

Disadvantages: - Requires fast and accurate deal validation - you need commissions calculated within 10-15 business days of month-end - Can encourage reps to push small deals early in the month rather than pursuing larger, longer opportunities - Monthly accelerator calculations can be complex if quotas are set annually

Best for: SDRs, inside sales, SMB AEs, and any role with deal cycles under 60 days.

Quarterly Payouts

Quarterly commissions are calculated at the end of each fiscal quarter and paid within 30-45 days. All deals closed in Q1 are paid out together.

Advantages: - Aligns naturally with quarterly quota periods and QBRs - Gives reps a longer runway to recover from a slow month - Easier to calculate cumulative accelerators - one calculation per quarter instead of three - Creates natural “closing energy” as quarter-end approaches

Disadvantages: - Reps wait 4-5 months from the start of a quarter to see the full payout (close in January, paid in May) - Large lump-sum payouts can strain cash flow, especially if Q4 is your biggest quarter - Reps who miss quota in Q1 may mentally check out for the remainder of the quarter

Best for: Mid-market and enterprise AEs with 60-120 day deal cycles, and roles with quarterly quotas.

Annual Payouts

Annual commissions are calculated once at fiscal year-end and paid as a single lump sum, often within 60-90 days of year-end close.

Advantages: - Maximum flexibility for reps to manage deal timing across the full year - Simplest calculation - one attainment figure, one payout - Strong retention lever (reps are less likely to leave mid-year with a large payout pending)

Disadvantages: - Weakest behavioral link between effort and reward - a deal closed in February is not paid until March of the following year - Massive cash outflow in a single period - Reps may not fully understand their earnings trajectory until late in the year - If a rep leaves mid-year, proration disputes are common and ugly

Best for: Rarely recommended as the sole frequency. Sometimes used for annual bonuses on secondary measures (e.g., customer retention, strategic objectives).

The Hybrid Approach

Most mature SaaS companies use a hybrid model that captures the benefits of multiple frequencies:

Component Frequency Example
Primary commissions Monthly or quarterly 70% of variable pay, paid on closed-won bookings
Accelerator bonuses Quarterly 20% of variable pay, calculated on cumulative quarterly attainment
Annual performance bonus Annual 10% of variable pay, tied to full-year attainment or MBO

This structure provides regular income (monthly commissions), periodic upside (quarterly accelerators), and a retention anchor (annual bonus).

Pro tip: If you use a hybrid model, make sure reps can clearly see all three components in their commission statements. Complexity without transparency breeds distrust.

Impact on Cash Flow Planning

Work with your finance team to model the cash impact of your chosen frequency:

  • Monthly payouts spread cost evenly but require consistent processing speed
  • Quarterly payouts create predictable spikes - budget an additional 15-25% above average monthly comp expense for quarter-end months
  • Annual payouts require a year-end reserve - set aside 1/12 of projected annual commissions each month

Key Takeaways

  • Monthly payouts create the strongest link between performance and reward and suit short-cycle roles
  • Quarterly payouts align with natural business rhythms but delay gratification and can strain cash flow
  • Annual payouts are best reserved for secondary bonuses, not primary commissions
  • A hybrid approach - monthly commissions, quarterly accelerators, annual bonus - gives you the best of all three